top of page

Review: Between The River And The Sea (Royal Court, Jerwood Theatre Upstairs)

Review by Matthew Plampton


⭐️⭐️⭐️


How do you dramatise one of the most polarising geopolitical conflicts of our time through the lens of a single life? That is the challenge facing Between The River And The Sea, written by Yousef Sweid and Isabella Sedlak, arriving at the Royal Court's Jerwood Theatre Upstairs following international acclaim. In this autobiographical one-person piece, Sweid recounts his experience of being raised as a Christian-Arab-Palestinian-Israeli in Haifa, and now raising two Jewish-Arab-Austrian children in Berlin, all whilst navigating a custody battle that threatens to unravel his family. But would this deeply personal story succeed in illuminating the broader political landscape it inhabits?


Sweid is an undeniably charming and charismatic performer, and from the moment he addresses the audience, he establishes an easy rapport that draws you into his world. There is a warmth and a playfulness to his delivery that allows for genuine moments of humour; he is a natural storyteller, and the more intimate, confessional passages of the piece benefit enormously from his ability to hold a room. Sedlak's direction builds on Sweid’s performance, making effective use of a handheld microphone, which becomes far more than a practical tool. It is deployed to conjure different characters' voices, to shift the power dynamics within scenes, and to generate moments of physical comedy that Sweid lands with real precision. This device also facilitates some striking lighting choices, casting Sweid's shadow across the space to a powerful visual effect, adding a theatricality that elevates the more stripped-back staging.



It is in the closing sequences that Between The River And The Sea locates its emotional core, and where the piece is at its most poignant. Sweid's exploration of the cost of neutrality, the friendships lost when one refuses to pick a side, carries a quiet devastation that stays with you as you contemplate your own views. The piece builds to a vision of hope from his son; Pride in Tehran and a borderless Israel and Gaza, that is undeniably beautiful in its aspiration, and Sweid delivers it with a sincerity that is genuinely moving. These final moments suggest a piece capable of real emotional power, and it is here that his personal narrative and the political landscape converge most effectively.


However, Between The River And The Sea is a piece that struggles at times to reconcile its competing ambitions. The opening frames the evening as a fascinating examination of the political situation in the Middle East, touching on protest, identity, and the complexities of allegiance. Yet this is quickly reframed as a story about Sweid's divorce and custody battle, and the piece never quite commits to being either of these things with sufficient depth. The political and the personal jostle for space without ever fully integrating, leaving both strands feeling somewhat underdeveloped.


The middle sections prove the most problematic, feeling disjointed in its structure, with tales of romance and sex from his younger years. Whilst there are humorous passages that showcase Sweid's considerable comic abilities, the narrative thread becomes unclear. These sequences gesture towards a powerful message about love transcending racial and cultural divides, yet this theme struggles to land with the force it deserves; the stories feel sporadic and insufficiently connected to build the necessary emotional momentum. The comedy, enjoyable as it is in the moment, occasionally feels disconnected from the gravity of the subject matter, as though the piece is circling its most important arguments without ever quite landing on them.



More fundamentally, there is a tension at the heart of the piece's central thesis that remains unresolved. The narrative champions remaining neutral, choosing empathy and peaceful options over picking a side through protest or war. This is an aspirational position, and one that is presented with evident sincerity. Yet the piece never truly grapples with the brutality of the situation it depicts, the terror, the devastation, the reality that for most people caught within this conflict, neutrality is not a privilege they possess. Does remaining neutral and merely hoping for peace do anything to stop the atrocities? It is a question the piece raises implicitly but never confronts head-on, and its absence leaves a significant gap in what should be the work's most urgent argument.


Between The River And The Sea is a piece with genuine moments of poignancy, buoyed by a magnetic central performance and some inventive theatrical choices. When Sweid connects the personal to the political, particularly in those closing passages, the piece achieves something quietly powerful. Yet it never quite sustains this which, when combined with a reluctance to fully engage with the harsher realities of the conflict it addresses, prevents it from reaching the heights its most affecting moments promise. The intent is strong, and the performer charismatic, but the piece itself has not quite found the shape to match its ambition.


Between The River And The Sea plays at the Royal Court Theatre until 9th May. Tickets from https://royalcourttheatre.com/events/between-the-river-and-the-sea/

bottom of page